H1000 is on my would like list of powders too. Perhaps the IMR Enduron series will probably be perfectly favored and I'm able to move to that for better availability.
Ballistically, Hodgdon H4831 SC Powder is the exact duplicate of H4831. Physically, it's a shorter grain dimension, hence, the designation SC or small Lower. The shorter, far more compact kernels allow the powder to movement in the powder actions more efficiently, assisting to relieve the regular reducing of granules.
What is the real difference? Compression. With no Extraordinary/heavy compression related to the very long grain 7828, the strain curve was altered as well as the load fell apart.
Run your load up with the specific powder (sc or standard) and good deal you're utilizing though. Similar burn off price doesn't suggest it's going to behave "precisely" exactly the same. I have observed over a hundred fps distinction between sc and mil-surp a great deal of H4831.
The only real distinction as I realize it is that the SC was created to do the job as a result of powder measures superior (which it does). The lengthier grains will not feed very well in any respect in some measures. Thats my 02 :grin:
It's likely that no further more discussion is required, during which scenario we propose setting up a different thread. If however you feel your response is required you are able to nevertheless achieve this.
Hodgdon H4831SC (Small Minimize) extruded rifle propellant is actually a major option for major match hunters who use handloader rifles. Introduced in the fifties, this propellant has become enhanced with shorter grain sizes which allows improved powder circulation and even more uniformity.
Im under the knowing I desire to use h4831sc. I've read that these powders are similar besides the shorter grain measurement on the sc. Should I even now be looking out for h4381sc?
It's possible you'll possibly: one) Go on and possess the firearm(s) stated underneath mechanically removed from your procuring cart:
Liberalism; The impossible yet recognized Idea that it is entirely probable to choose up a turd with the clean stop.
Operate your load up with the particular powder (sc or regular) and ton you're applying even though. Exact melt away amount doesn't suggest it will behave "accurately" a similar. I have witnessed more than a hundred fps difference h4831sc between sc and mil-surp plenty of H4831.
Like everyone said, the SC means “quick Lower” and is particularly a little bit simpler to meter. Makes you issue why they might nonetheless make the standard a single.
Can I suppose that H4831 is usually substituted for H4831sc ? I understand the Bodily change but will it have an effect on the burn off or velocity? I do think not but I am not 100% confident.
I sawed just one in 50 % to see how h4831sc load data thick the jackets were being, they usually were being simply two times as thick for a fifty-grain hollow issue was. Ditto for the sixty four-grain Energy Stage, as these bullets are built for deer, not prairie canines or woodchucks. You now h4831sc load data know everything I know about the 22-250 and gradual-burning powders, and I do not know everything in the least in regards to the 223. I doubt that you're going to get anyplace with that cartridge and 4831, but let us know the way it goes.